Chichen Itza and El Castillo cubits

This essay is part of a series which begins by studying the dimensions of the "allotments" of Plato's Atlantis and finds the most probable stade in use was a stade of 165 feet which was 100 Sumerian cubits of 19.8" making 1,000 cubits per side for the allotment.

Studies were made of canals in Tabasco and Veracruz, Mexico, canals on the Bolivian Altiplano, then, since Sumerian units were also brought to Veracruz by the Spanish conquistadors who used a yard or Vara which was 33.0" and identical to the Sumerian yard of 33.0", the studies were extended to the city of Teotihuacan which was decidedly pre-Conquest and dates to 150 A.D.

Since accurate published survey material was not available for Teotihuacan, measurements were made by satellite using Google Earth.

Survey data has been found for sites in Yukatan, Mexico, at Chichen Itza and Tikal and this essay looks at these these measurements to see if any of them are consistent with "Sumerian" measurements.


Above, El Castillo in 1860 and El Castillo today.

The fundamental "Sumerian" units were a "shusi" of 0.66", link of 7.92", foot of 20 shusi = 13.2", cubit of 30 shusi = 19.8" , yard of 50 shusi = 33.0, and double yard of 100 shusi = 66.0".

'Egyptian' cubits of 20.625" are sometimes found alongside 'Sumerian' cubits since they are related in the ration of 25/24.

The Megalithic Yard of 32.64" found by prof A. Thom in the British Isles was also related to the Sumerian yard in the manner of the Megalithic Yard relating to a year of 365.24 days while the Sumerian Yard of 33.0" related to the mathematical year of 360 days.

Drawings to a high degree of accuracy were found to be available freely from


Cyark

above, The CyArk survey was done to an extremely high degree of accuracy.

The Cyark drawings were then printed and scaled measurements made by J.M. Allen to provide the interpretations found below. Although scaled measurements can be made from the drawings, some drawings had the additional advantage of surveyed measurements incorporated into them.

We do not know which parts of ancient sites may have been set out according to a set plan or even to any degree of accuracy and have to consider also that reconstructions may have been made due to ruinous states of some buildings, but these scaled drawings suggest that the buildings were accurately planned according to a system of "Sumerian" feet, yards and cubits, and corresponding multiples in "Egyptian" royal cubits and Mayan "hunabs" which were 2 x "Egyptian" royal cubits.

scale bar Sumerian cubits and Egyptian cubits

n.b. in the preceding drawings, the scale bars have been reproduced in size appropriate to the drawings

Tiwanaku calendar
Click here for Tiwanaku calendar

Atlantis stade
Click here for Atlantis stade

Atlantis cubits between Altiplano canals
Click here for cubits between altiplano canals

Teotihuacan measuring unit
Click here for Teotihuacan measuring unit

Teotihuacan measuring unit at the citadel
Click here for citadel cubits, Teotihuacan measuring unit

Monte Alban cubits measuring units
Click here for Monte Alban, measuring units

Jim Allen, 23 June 2009
email webatlantis@hotmail.com


atlantisbolivia.org